← Back to workspace
Evidence bundle

CPO-0018Zoro Guehi

Buyo, Côte d’Ivoire · 2.65 ha · cocoa · 6.191125, -7.941089

Disqualified
100% confidence · 4.1 s · €0.0015
Disqualified under Article 9(1)(d)

Plot CPO-0018 (Zoro Guehi, Buyo, CI) covers 2.65 ha under cocoa. 2.66 ha of this plot was mapped as forest on 31 December 2020 and 2.66 ha of it has since been cleared (2022, 2023, 2024). Under Article 9(1)(d) that disqualifies the commodities from this plot from the EU market.

What the satellites saw

Imagery evidence

Rendered server-side from the same pixels the verdict was computed from. Deliberately not smoothed: blocky pixels are honest about what a 10-metre sensor can resolve. The white outline is the boundary the cooperative submitted.

Green: mapped as forest on 31 Dec 2020. Red: tree-cover loss after the cut-off. Amber: loss before the cut-off, which EUDR does not penalise. White outline: the declared plot.
Forest baseline & detected loss

Green: mapped as forest on 31 Dec 2020. Red: tree-cover loss after the cut-off. Amber: loss before the cut-off, which EUDR does not penalise. White outline: the declared plot.

JRC Global Forest Cover 2020 + Global Forest Change (Hansen/UMD)

Cloud-free median of 1 Sentinel-2 acquisition from the period around 31 December 2020 — the state the law measures against.
Around the cut-off — 2020-03-01

Cloud-free median of 1 Sentinel-2 acquisition from the period around 31 December 2020 — the state the law measures against.

Sentinel-2 L2A (surface reflectance) — median of 1 scene (S2A_29NPG_20200301_0_L2A)

Cloud-free median of 1 recent Sentinel-2 acquisition over the same ground.
Today — 2026-01-29

Cloud-free median of 1 recent Sentinel-2 acquisition over the same ground.

Sentinel-2 L2A (surface reflectance) — median of 1 scene (S2C_29NPG_20260129_0_L2A)

Convergence of evidence

Three independent datasets

Each line is reported on its own terms. Where they disagree, the disagreement is shown rather than resolved by quietly preferring one source - because an auditor citing the other source is exactly the situation this has to survive.

Not decisive aloneForest cover at the EUDR cut-off (31 Dec 2020)1243 ms

2.66 ha of this plot (100%) was mapped as forest on the cut-off date. That does not make the plot non-compliant on its own — standing forest is not a breach — but it means any clearing after 31 December 2020 would be.

Baseline forest (ha)2.655
Baseline forest (%)100
Plot area measured (ha)2.655
Grid resolution (m)10
Pixels sampled339

JRC Global Forest Cover 2020 · V4 (2026 release) · European Commission — Joint Research Centre · 10 m · CC BY 4.0

BreachAnnual tree-cover loss after the cut-off325 ms

2.66 ha of land that was forest at the cut-off has since been cleared (2022, 2023, 2024).

Post-cut-off loss on forest (ha)2.655
Total loss recorded, all years (ha)2.655
Years with loss2022, 2023, 2024
Detection floor (ha)0.09

Global Forest Change (Hansen/UMD) · GFC-2024-v1.12 · University of Maryland GLAD / Google · 30 m · CC BY 4.0

BreachHigh-resolution canopy structure change since the cut-off2513 ms

Canopy moisture inside the plot has fallen sharply since the cut-off (NDMI -0.228), which is consistent with loss of closed canopy.

Canopy moisture change (NDMI)-0.2279
Greenness change (NDVI)-0.0686
Baseline scenes stacked1
Baseline clear coverage (%)100
Current scenes stacked1
Current clear coverage (%)100
Plot pixels compared261
Probative for deforestationyes — forest present at cut-off

Sentinel-2 L2A (surface reflectance) · Collection 1, AWS Open Data · ESA Copernicus / Element 84 Earth Search · 10 m · Copernicus open licence

Cut-off: 2020-12-31

When the forest went

Hectares of land that was mapped as forest on the cut-off date and was cleared in each subsequent year.

2022
0.426 ha
2023
1.532 ha
2024
0.697 ha
Article 10(4)

Every criterion assessed and recorded

Article 10(4) requires the operator to demonstrate how the information was checked against each criterion and how the degree of risk was determined. That means recording the criteria that came back clear, not only the ones that fired.

ArticleCriterionOutcome
10(2)(a)
Country risk classification
Côte d'Ivoire: standard risk tier — simplified due diligence not available.
triggered
10(2)(b)
Presence of forests in the country of production
Côte d'Ivoire retains significant forest cover, so conversion risk is material and the geolocation analysis carries real weight.
triggered
10(2)(c)
Presence of Indigenous Peoples
No recognised Indigenous territories are recorded for Côte d'Ivoire in our country profile.
n/a
10(2)(d)
Consultation with Indigenous Peoples
Criterion (c) does not apply, so (d) does not arise.
n/a
10(2)(e)
Claims by Indigenous Peoples over the land
Criterion (c) does not apply, so (e) does not arise.
n/a
10(2)(f)
Prevalence of deforestation in the country
severe deforestation pressure recorded for Côte d'Ivoire.
triggered
10(2)(g)
Source and reliability of the information
2 unresolved issue(s) on the submitted geolocation.
triggered
10(2)(h)
Governance, corruption and enforcement concerns
CPI 45/100 for Côte d'Ivoire does not indicate elevated falsification risk.
cleared
10(2)(i)
Complexity of the supply chain
Direct sourcing with full plot-level traceability.
cleared
10(2)(j)
Risk of circumvention or mixing
Declared volume is consistent with the mapped area and no duplicate geometries were found.
cleared
10(2)(k)
Conclusions of Commission expert groups
No expert-group conclusion published in the Commission register currently bears on this commodity and origin in a way that changes the assessment.
cleared
10(2)(l)
Substantiated concerns and non-compliance history
No substantiated concerns under Article 31 and no recorded prior infringement in this chain.
cleared
10(2)(m)
Any other information pointing to a risk
No further adverse information identified; land tenure evidence is on file.
cleared
10(2)(n)
Complementary certification information
Covered by Fairtrade. Treated as complementary evidence only: Article 10(2)(n) admits it solely where it meets the Article 9 information requirements, and certification is never a substitute for geolocation.
cleared
Composite risk
100/ 100 · severe

Only “negligible” (below 10) clears Article 10(1). Anything above it means Article 11 mitigation is owed before the product may be placed on the market.

Findings
3(a) / 9(1)(d)2.66 ha of deforestation detected on this plot+100

Land inside this plot that the JRC mapped as forest on 31 December 2020 was cleared in 2022, 2023, 2024. Article 9(1)(d) states that any deforestation on a plot "shall automatically disqualify all relevant commodities and relevant products from those plots of land" from the EU market. This is not a risk to be mitigated; it is a disqualification.

→ Exclude this plot from the supply. Article 11 mitigation cannot cure an Article 3(a) failure.

10(2)(g)2 unresolved data-quality issues on the geolocation+14

Article 10(2)(g) turns on "the source, reliability, validity, and links to other available documentation" of the Article 9 information. Outstanding: Coordinates carry only 3 decimal digits; Coordinates carry only 3 decimal digits.

→ Resolve every blocker and error before the statement is submitted.

10(2)(f)Severe national deforestation pressure+4

Côte d'Ivoire is experiencing severe rates of forest loss, much of it driven by the expansion of exactly this commodity. That raises the base rate of non-compliance for any plot in the country, independent of what this particular plot shows.

→ Maintain continuous monitoring rather than a one-time check.

10(2)(a)Côte d'Ivoire is standard risk — full due diligence applies+3

Côte d'Ivoire is not on the low-risk Annex to Reg. 2025/1093, so it defaults to standard risk. The Article 13 simplified route is unavailable and the full Article 10 and 11 obligations apply. Competent authorities must check 3% of operators sourcing from here annually.

→ Complete Article 10 assessment and retain the evidence for five years.

Provenance
Verification id
VER-619347744898
Evidence hash
619347744898000d…
Plot geometry id
PLT-9983F5D67EB5FCDC
Engine version
1.0.0
Verified at
2026-09-15 10:00:00Z
Capture method
gps perimeter walk
Article 10(1)

Written risk assessment

Assembled deterministically from the measurements rather than generated freely, so the same evidence always produces the same assessment.

Plot CPO-0018 (Zoro Guehi, Buyo, CI) covers 2.65 ha under cocoa. 2.66 ha of this plot was mapped as forest on 31 December 2020 and 2.66 ha of it has since been cleared (2022, 2023, 2024). Under Article 9(1)(d) that disqualifies the commodities from this plot from the EU market.

The finding rests on 3 independent evidence lines: JRC Global Forest Cover 2020 (V4 (2026 release)); Global Forest Change (Hansen/UMD) (GFC-2024-v1.12); Sentinel-2 L2A (surface reflectance) (Collection 1, AWS Open Data). 2.66 ha of this plot (100%) was mapped as forest on the cut-off date. That does not make the plot non-compliant on its own — standing forest is not a breach — but it means any clearing after 31 December 2020 would be. 2.66 ha of land that was forest at the cut-off has since been cleared (2022, 2023, 2024). Canopy moisture inside the plot has fallen sharply since the cut-off (NDMI -0.228), which is consistent with loss of closed canopy.

The Article 10(2) assessment raised 4 findings, giving a composite risk score of 100 (severe). The most material are: 2.66 ha of deforestation detected on this plot [3(a) / 9(1)(d)]; 2 unresolved data-quality issues on the geolocation [10(2)(g)]; Severe national deforestation pressure [10(2)(f)].

Article 11 mitigation cannot cure this. Article 9(1)(d) disqualifies the commodities from this plot automatically, so the plot must be excluded from the consignment and the volume attributed to it re-sourced.

Confidence qualifiers: Multiple independent lines agree on a large, unambiguous clearing.